![]() And the Judicial Conference itself has never publicly identified or discussed the cognitive benefits of video. Saw fit to mention the pilot program at all. ![]() Courts, 2014 Annual Report of the Director, ĪdministrativeOffice/DirectorAnnualReport/annual-report-2014.aspx (on file with the Columbia Law Review) (last visited Apr. nor the most recent Annual Report of the Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. 31, 2014), available at (on file with the Columbia Law Review). Roberts, Jr., 2014 Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciary (Dec. Neither the Chief Justice’s 2014 Year-End Report on the Judiciary-which focused specifically on the use of technology in the federal courts 4 4 Whether the Conference will do so is another matter. The Judicial Conference should welcome this development, and should seize the opportunity to extend and expand the pilot program beyond its scheduled sunset date in July 2015. Put another way, videotaped proceedings trigger a variety of cognitive processes in the viewer that cannot be duplicated by consulting standard written materials or secondhand information. Ready access to recorded proceedings enables attorneys to familiarize themselves with the culture of a particular courtroom and the personality of a particular judge, and allows litigants and prospective witnesses to familiarize themselves with the nature and flow of courtroom activity. The pilot program has emerged as an extraordinary resource for federal adjudication, providing a modern window into the courthouse for busy lawyers, anxious litigants, and a curious public. UnderstandingtheFederalCourts/AdministrativeOffice/DirectorAnnualReport/annual-report-2013/the-courts/ongoing-pilots-projects-and-reports.aspx (on file with the Columbia Law Review). Courts, 2013 Annual Report of the Director, Ongoing Pilots and Projects, available at Collectively, the videos have been viewed hundreds of thousands of times. To date, more than 135 proceedings have been added to a growing video library, representing activity before dozens of different judges. (listing range of proceedings available under “Procedural Posture” tab). ![]() These videos, authorized by the Judicial Conference of the United States as part of a federal “Cameras in Courts” pilot program, cover an extensive range of full-length civil proceedings, from status conferences to multi-day trials. Courts, (on file with the Columbia Law Review) (last visited Apr. For the past three-and-a-half years, fourteen federal district courts have quietly posted hundreds of hours of digital video to the Internet for public viewing. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |